Thursday, 15 May 2008

RED ALERT: The OC Denies Being Compromised By Lavish Praise On The ABC News Website // Rumours of Soviet or Latte Left Infiltration in OC Bunker Rejected

When one is praised lavishly the least one can do is respond graciously by reproducing in full (and re-reading seventeen times):

Baillieu and the blogs of war

By Jason Wilson, Axel Bruns and Barry Saunders

Posted 4 hours 2 minutes ago
Updated 3 hours 30 minutes ago

On Saturday night the story broke about two Victorian Liberal Party staffers who had been sacked for blogging.

Needless to say, they weren't using the blog to share recipes or post pictures of their cats. Rather, it was a venue for some pointed, ad hominem criticism of the party's parliamentary leader in the State, Ted Baillieu. Although the original blog has been locked down, a range of people have taken the trouble to archive its contents elsewhere. Care for a sample?

"With ambition not seen since the early life of Mao Tse Tung; with paranoia not seen since the time of Emperor Tiberius; and a proclivity for nepotism not seen since the papel court of Pope Innocent the tenth - Red Ted is the ultimate hypocrite. If you think about it for a moment Ted Baillieu has many of the attributes of a Roman Emperor, except greatness." (OC: Whoever wrote deserves some kind of medal not expulsion)

It could be dismissed as the merest abuse if it came from outside the party, but given that it was set up and maintained from the Liberals' State headquarters, and the formerly anonymous bloggers were unmasked as paid party operatives, revelations about the "blogs of war" have had a range of consequences. Not least of these has been making Baillieu's already shaky leadership start to look terminal.

Breaking blog

Part of the interest here for us is that the story of the sackings was broken by a blogger. From Monday it was all over the media, and the first mainstream outlet to run it was the Sunday Age. (OC: Clearly the Sunday Herald Sun is considered a mainstream outlet in some circles) But it first came to light in The Other Cheek, the gleefully-muckraking, tabloid-style blog of Andrew Landeryou. (OC: Lump in throat #1. To be deemed tabloid is the highest praise.)

Landeryou's political preferences mean that he's been supportive of the bloggers in his reporting, backing their criticisms of the "latte-sipping" Baillieu's leftward drift. (Other right-of-centre bloggers like Andrew Elder have instead condemned their "treachery" to their leader) 

Landeryou has some purchase in the mainstream media with a News Limited column (OC: I wish, perhaps they know something I don't), but essentially he's working in the blogging space, using his political, business and media contacts to embarrass, harass and hold to account the state's worthies and not-so-worthies, and his own enemies, through open publishing. (OC: Amen to that)

Whatever you think of his politics (OC: What's not to like?), Landeryou is a lively and engaging writer who find things out - one whose "inquisitive" approach allows him to uncover and share new information. This isn't his first scoop, and it almost certainly won't be his last. (OC: Lump in throat #2)

Landeryou is a lively and engaging writer who find things out - one whose "inquisitive" approach allows him to uncover and share new information. This isn't his first scoop, and it almost certainly won't be his last. (OC: Oops I appear to have cut and pasted that paragraph twice. Never mind.)

The second interesting thing is the way in which the technology of blogging has helped to embarrass and imperil a party's leadership. There's some justified scepticism towards experts who argue that blogging is already having significant effects on political institutions, but incidents like this make their claims more compelling.

The lure of blogging's apparent anonymity, instant posting and global distribution has in this case led a couple of staffers to risk publishing things that they would hitherto have reserved for bar-room gossip. (OC: Exactly and no one ever got expelled for that) Time and again, the history of blogging has shown that online anonymity isn't quite as complete or safe as we might think. This won't be the last time that careers are threatened, and political earthquakes felt, as a result of blogospheric indiscretions by those who thought they were untraceable.

Blanket ban?

Unfortunately, all this will probably lead the Liberals to crack down on staff blogging - one might guess that a blanket ban has been instituted (or reiterated) in the Victorian branch already. (OC: LOL, that's a safe bet, Nutty might well remove all the PCs from the third floor at 104 the way things are going. Or at least key logger software on everyone's PC up there that alerts Ted's mobile phone every time T-E-D or P-I-N-K-O is typed. Pol Pot would be proud) Once the Schadenfreude has ebbed away, other branches and other parties might well do the same. We'd suggest, though, that this could only be counterproductive, and that the entire situation has only arisen precisely because of a widespread reluctance to engage with the possibilities of the new media of produsage.

Towards the end of the election campaign, Jason and Marcus Westbury pointed out in Crikey that the Liberals, above all others, had refused any involvement with online political initiatives. Reports since the election have suggested that the ban on online campaigning may have come down from on high, perhaps even from the artist formerly known as "she who must be obeyed", Janette Howard.

From these facts, it might reasonably be concluded that the lack of organisational engagement with blogs, citizen journalism or social media has meant that Liberal Party staffers and parliamentary representatives alike are uneducated about the opportunities and threats posed by these platforms.

A quick workshop on the limits of online anonymity might have led the sacked staffers to lock down their blogs, take more precautions, and at least maintain their blogs from home computers. Bespoke internal online forums might have enabled them to vent their spleen in less damaging ways. But the staffers and the party were unprepared for an anonymous blog to have such wide-ranging consequences, mostly because they haven't taken the trouble to understand or use the new platforms.

All of this just underlines the fact that online publishing platforms are now firmly established as a part of the political landscape.

"The media" which politicians have always had to deal with are more ubiquitous now, and less manageable. It's harder to play gatekeeper on internal dissent, and harder to crisis-manage when dissent becomes public.

Political parties who fail to adapt will continue to be embarrassed by blogs; those who do not professionally incorporate the new platforms into their communications strategies will increasingly come to look like amateurs.

Jason Wilson, Axel Bruns and Barry Saunders are researchers on an ARC-funded project investigating citizen journalism in Australia. They publish the group blog Gatewatching.

Game on.

Click here to Read More on this post...

HUNGRY TONY: One-Time Prime Ministerial Aspirant Tony Abbott Steals Grub From Journo's Plate At Canberra Eatery

In the Daily Telegraph, their scribe Kate reports:

THOSE poor old former Howard government ministers. Only months ago they cried they weren't being paid enough and needed a rise.

We were told they were doing it tough - and now there's proof.

Unable to afford even a $55 restaurant meal, ex-ministers now have to resort to eating half-eaten food straight off the plate of strangers.

And I can vouch for this. It happened to happen to me.

Oh my. Who could this be? She's too polite to say:

Out of my seat for a quick toilet break, one nameless ex-minister had no trouble keeping my seat warm on Tuesday night.

But of course the OC is willing to name names.

It was former Rhodes Scholar, former Federal Minister of the Crown, Prime Ministerial aspirant Tony Abbott according to several appalled witnesses who shared their concerns with the OC.

Perhaps he was trying to demonstrate just how serious he was about the need to pay MP's more.

While perhaps demonstrating that he is not so much prime ministerial material as a complete pig. Oink oink.

Game on.

Click here to Read More on this post...

GIVE ME A BREAK: Neil Mitchell Thinks Anti Ted Website Was Cybercrime

There's much to admire about 3AW's Neil Mitchell. But his column in the Herald Sun today which touched on the Baillieu blog crisis was not much short of a disgrace.

He notes his dislike of the anti Ted Baillieu blog and also that it might well achieve its goal of removing Red Ted as Liberal party leader:

First, this nasty and destructive style of politics that is manipulated by vicious people motivated by power rather than public service may now surge because it has caused exactly the type of political pain it was intended to cause.

He then thinks should be a matter for Victoria Police. Excuse me?

Second, if Victoria Police is not rattled by the atrocious treatment of Mr Baillieu then the organisation is asleep. What has happened has been cyber bullying at its worst.

What the? You have to wonder whether Mitchell has read the site (available here). While it was harsh and some of the criticism was personal, it's certainly no worse than what can be read on the OC Blog of Freedom which we know for a fact enjoys a big audience down in 3AW's South Melbourne bunker. And not much worse than some of the invective laid on by Mitchell on air, when he really loses it and goes after someone for their humbug, he's tough, usually fair but sometimes just as brutal as what goes on in the blogosphere.

TRIVIALISING A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN DEFENCE OF RED DEAD TED

Cyber bullying and stalking is a different thing entirely, especially against children. That is a gravely serious problem that ought not be trivialised by Neil Mitchell equating a blog that expressed political opposition to Ted Baillieu with a site set up by kids to terrorise another kid. Or worse.

Linking the two shows pretty lazy thinking in my respectful opinion. Hopefully that assertion won't have Neil's Nanny-state concerned that we might be cyber-bullying him.

His assertion, after talking about the many genuine problems involving kids and the internet is one of the least worthy and most absurd things he has probably ever written:

The Baillieu experience shows how dangerous and how sophisticated it (cyber-crime) has become.

Comparing sexually harassed kids or victims of stalking with the anti-Ted site is outrageous and wrong. I doubt even Ted Baillieu's bungling buffoons on staff would have come up with that one. Then again, Simon Troeth seems a creative soul.

Now it is true that the OC's investigations have led us to conclude that the site was always intended to have an "audience of one", ie Ted Baillieu. But he is the Leader of the Liberal party in Victoria and the alternative Premier. If he can't cope with a website from internal party critics then he should really go back to counting all the money he inherited. If he can't stand the heat...

NEIL MITCHELL'S POWER GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO DEEM OTHER COMMENTATORS INVALID // IS TELLING HIM TO SOD OFF CYBER-BULLYING?

Mitchell writes:

It has shown the internet can be a dangerous weapon that gives undue power to anonymous, cowardly people.

And while the reference to "undue power" is inappropriate here because the website has only had the power invested in it by Ted Baillieu's over-reaction to it, it is clear that anonymous hate blogs are an issue.

That's part of the reason why the OC has revealed the identity of a number of anonymous bloggers in the past and why we'll continue to do it. One in particular is going to have reason to think that life can be very cruel at times when we get time to allocate to him.

If they can dish it out, they think anonymously, then they'd really be well advised to get used to the idea that in truth there is no genuine anonymity online.

It's certainly true that when your name is attached to what you write, there's a much greater discipline on it. A discipline much stronger than any laws of defamation could be.

HE CONDEMNS A WHOLE MEDIUM JUST LIKE SOME USED TO SLAG "THE WIRELESS" IN ITS EARLY DAYS

Mitchell continues:

This week has shown that because it is anonymous the internet can be used by political "rats" to spread malicious and inaccurate material that would never appear in mainstream media, which can be held accountable.

This is foolish. The internet is just like any other means of publishing. It is accountable.

I remember Jon Faine, apparently a former solicitor turned ABCista de North Fitzroy, asserting on air that blogs were exempt from the laws of defamation. Complete nonsense of course.

The OC tells it how it is and many assume that means that we are fearless about being sued by rich and powerful people who use lawyers like silencers because somehow the laws of defamation or whatever doesn't apply to us. They most certainly do.

If the rich and the thick are willing to use the courts for that end - which is their right - we are willing to use the courts to publicise and explore via the discovery process and a defamation trial itself the matters of which they complain. It's a public process that is ultimately not very rewarding for those who have things to hide.

Unless of course, we've made a mistake and got it wrong in which case the only thing for it is to do what no newspaper ever adequately does, correct its errors with equal if not superior prominence to the original erroneous claim. And apologise. We've said sorry before and we'll no doubt say it again but we don't have to often because we're not often wrong.

REAL ACCOUNTABILITY

And some say, even if it is technically possible, you're broke, it's not worth suing you. Perhaps that's true but it is very rare indeed for defamation actions to be motivated by a desire to make money, especially now with the statutory caps on defamation awards. Caps I totally oppose by the way. The $250,000 cap is an arbitrary and completely bogus limit on what courts can award the defamed. Why was it introduced? Because of the effective lobbying of the kind of mainstream media companies which employ Neil Mitchell who wanted lower insurance premiums on their defamation risk.

Losing 250 grand would barely be noticed by Rupert Murdoch or Ron Walker.

Which leaves the single greatest accountability factor of all. Which we very much in common with Neil Mitchell or any of his grouchy compatriots. A desire to get it right. A great fear of being embarrassed by getting it wrong.

That's the accountability we live with every day, every post, every sentence.

And sometimes we will aim, fire and miss. But we'll always try to get it right because when we do, we advance the cause of freedom and help persuade people to the righteousness of our just cause: to afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted, to speak truth to power and to offer patriots detailed news and views about politics they'll never get to see in mainstream newspapers because of their political biases or limitations of space.

AS THE AGED DIES, WE ALL STAND UP IN ITS PLACE WITHOUT ANTI-SEMITIC PIGS LIKE MICHAEL LEUNIG (UH OH, IS THAT CYBER BULLYING?)

He should remember that as The Age's newsroom shrinks through inevitable downsizing, the OC's army of sources, contributors and patriots expands. We (not just the OC but the many excellent blogs out there as well)  are the rising tide that will drown The Age (new circulation numbers we'll put up tomorrow) which is being dragged down already by the gradual death of classifieds advertising.

Mitchell wants to be editor of The Age people say, giving up a much more important job on radio. His desire to Captain SS Titanic is noble if he could limit its ultra left excesses but equally perilous. Its demise like Red Ted's is clearly inevitable. Just a question of when.

THIS IS THE GOLDEN AGE OF POLITICAL JOURNALISM

For all its downside, the new possibilities for communicating have the potential to usher in a golden age of political journalism, no longer monopolised by cultural elites but populated by a seething mix of leftards and patriots slugging it out, sometimes with harsh words, sometimes persuading, sometimes preaching to the choir but almost always adding to the sum total of human knowledge, debate and thought in a way that vastly exceeds what our grand-parents and their parents were able to enjoy. This is truly the golden age for political journalism and don't let any Monthly reading, beret wearing lefty grouch in a Westgarth coffee shop tell you otherwise.

Look at how we've been using Twitter this week in the upper right-hand corner of this site. Another new way of imparting information, micro-blogging some call it. And yes OK, it wasn't working this morning but even that tells us something. These new media will have teething problems but what these tools can do for us can be wonderful. Next week, we'll talk more at length about Twitter, why you need to get on it yourself and how we plan to use it to ensure that this blog is very frequently updated with the latest news, at light speed.

The world isn't just changing, it's changed.

It's time Neil Mitchell, so often an excellent judge of where Melbourne is at outside its latte belt on his very solid radio show, got with the programme.

Game on.

Click here to Read More on this post...

KEMP UNDER THE GUN: Party President's Past Might Catch With Him If His Plans To Purge Liberal Party Patriots Proceeds

A senior Liberal operative within the Kroger faction has launched a blistering attack on Party President Dr David Kemp over his handling of Blog-Gate, the internal Liberal crisis triggered by the OC's revelations that two party staffers were sacked for writing a blog critical of the current party leader Ted Baillieu.

The operative said that his very clear memory of Dr Kemp's time as party state director was that he was also involved in the factional activities apparently so frowned upon by many Liberal party members and recently denounced by Baillieu.

FACTIONS NOT OFFICIALLY ACKNOWLEDGED BUT LARGE AND IN CHARGE

In the strange culture of the modern Liberal party, it is run by factions, there are faction fights that are openly discussed in newspapers and on this blog of freedom. Yet the party membership is said to be in denial about this. One of the gravest allegations one can make of another in the Liberal party apparently is that you used your Liberal party office to secure advantage for your faction.

Labor hack readers will have to suspend their disbelief that this is such a big deal, and the extent of it certainly surprises the OC, but being involved in a faction is seen by many rank and file Libs as a very dirty thing indeed or at the least a guilty pleasure.

For that reason, factional How To Vote tickets for State Council are usually only hand-written, furtively distributed to delegates like a copy of Playboy in a schoolyard and returned to the secret-faction-man when the conference delegate has finished with it and cast their vote. ALP equivalents are printed on reams of paper, usually on the brightest taxpayer funded Optix paper with the faction name in 72 point on top of it to remove any doubt.

Accordingly to accuse a Liberal state director or high party official of abusing their power to feather their own factional or personal nest is a very grave allegation in Liberal circles. In the ALP, it's considered a sign of mental illness, incompetence and failure if you don't use your elected position to advance your own faction's position.

POWER-SHARING MIGHT WORK

It is this bizarre thought process that leads there to be no power-sharing or proportional elections in Liberal party decision-making bodies. To a large extent, it's winner take all. In the ALP by contrast, every key decision making body is elected using proportional representation. In each state branch, almost without exception they have an Assistant Secretary from the second biggest faction and the State Secretary is from the biggest. It doesn't make the appointments any less meritorious, they often have good quality people in these roles.

The consequence of power sharing is it builds a sense of ownership. Give folk a sense they own nothing, will get constantly thrashed, have nothing to lose and they'll act in all sorts of destructive ways. Ted Baillieu confronted that head-on when asked to respond to a disgusting anti-semitic email sent by one of his supporters at 104 Exhibition Street.

KEMP'S NOW HUSHED UP FACTIONAL PAST WILL RESURFACE

One informant pointed out that in the late 1980s, while it is true that emails were not circulated, it was often the case that minutes and notes were taken at important meetings, including in the Liberal party of the day, private factional gatherings.

The operative claimed "there is a lot of dredging going on (through old files)" to ensure that if Kemp does initiate or tolerate expulsion in these clearly unfair circumstances then he "will pay a very high price indeed in terms of his reputation."

"If he tries to mess with the faction, the faction will mess with him," the operative explained. "Tell them in the blog 'We will get you Kemp.' He really should watch his back."

Older members of their group point to the messy and ugly circumstances of his preselection for Goldstein where Kemp brutally deposed Liberal wet Ian McPhee, apparently winning by just three votes in what was considered an important exercise in getting ready to govern by the Kroger/Costello faction. The Liberal wets who evolved into the Baillieu faction believed it to be an indulgent atrocity that prematurely ended the career of a very liberal Liberal who ought to have been protected.

Specifically, Kemp is accused of the same conduct by his own factional colleagues that Baillieu identified as so very scandalous in the first days of the Blog-Gate crisis. They say Dr Kemp used his position as a state director in an overtly factional way and that there is ample documentary evidence with minutes and copious notes taken at private gatherings which noted his participation in discussions about who was getting what in factional carve-ups including his own preselection and in factional ticketing and organisation.

"He was in it up to his neck, of course he was. Did he abuse his position to pursue a factional position? Ask Ian McPhee about it."

KEMP IS BANGING HEADS TOGETHER AND THEY ARE READY TO RESPOND WITH A LIVERPOOL KISS

Kemp has displeased factional operatives on both sides since becoming president by what one referred to as a "pious and sanctimonious" mindset that seems to forget his past and pretend he lived another political life to the head-kicking and scalp-taking that actually got him into Parliament all those years ago.

"Party members will be fascinated to see in documentary form exactly how dirty Kemp's hands are from a very long time ago."

"There are long memories and plenty of dusty files. If he pursues expulsions, he will inevitably become a target and few will accept his sanctimony and hypocrisy then," an angry observer remarked earlier today. "There are notes, minutes and memos with his name all over them, he cannot pretend to be a clean-skin."

When the OC asked one angry patriot whether Kemp was still in a Kroger faction, he said "Yes, up to a point. He's now running his own game. He has run off on his own tangent."

Another said "He is a pontificating weasel, if he persists with this expulsion shite, he will regret it."

Many party operatives talking with the OC have reached the view that Kemp will back down and that Baillieu will have to do so too.

CHANGE OR MORE OF THE SAME? RED TED HAS TO GO

In another stunning development, word came through throughout the afternoon of a number of MP's "talking tickets" about the possibility of assembling a ticket that would be able to defeat Baillieu. Mulder is now assumed to be the leadership candidate but it is widely understood that he will decline to be involved in any of what could be referred to as the "wet work."

But Mulder has done his bit, insiders say. The country gent's once rough around the edges grooming has exponentially improved in the past six months, in clear anticipation that a big opportunity would be presenting itself sometime soon. Liberals in Spring Street have noticed Mulder's hair cut more regularly, quite a few new suits, a general improving in the wardrobe and him presenting a little more polished than previously.

Many of the Toorak Toff brigade around Terry Mulder have apparently looked down their nose at the self-made Mulder who left school at fourteen and built a life from adversity with courage. The contrast with silver spoon Baillieu couldn't be any greater.

It's just their background either. One MP told the OC "Where Baillieu is paranoid; Mulder is relaxed but determined. Where Baillieu bullies and rants; Mulder listens and acts. Change is coming, Andrew."

Increasingly in the media and among the MP's dozing their way through parliamentary committees at the moment, there is a rapidly growing  expectation that Baillieu cannot long endure. He has started a fight that many say cannot be resolved other than by his departure.

One patriot likened Baillieu to a Palestinian terrorist who has messed with the might of the Kroger Israeli Defence Forces. "They might get a few thrill kills but we'll win the war, he's outmatched by a superior and smarter force."

THE GRASSROOTS ARE GLOWING OC GREEN WITH RAGE ABOUT RED TED'S SINISTER EMAIL FROLICS

While it's true many party members don't like factions, they are also unambiguously and nearly unanimously outraged by Baillieu's prosecution of this matter.

They see the leaking of private emails to the nations' most left-wing newspaper as little more than disgusting. Amazing to see this morning that Paul Austin at The Age now reporting: "Baillieu leadership under fire". Ya think, Comrade Paul?

They see talk of expulsion as over the top, petty, indulgent, counter-productive, vindictive and spiteful.

They are comfortable that there will be at least 30% on the Policy Assembly willing to stand up and block expulsions, even if it means a public repudiation of Ted Baillieu's leadership and his complete humiliation if he proved himself incapable of bumping off a bunch of twenty somethings after promising the public he'd excise this imaginary "cell" that's somehow out to get him.

Even some Baillieu faction members have shared with the OC their grave concern about the ugly precedent set. More than one blames the unsubtle head-kicker and one-time umbrella importer Michael Kapel for the mad decision to leak emails in an attempt to smear the reputations of their targets.

It worked to a point. Some of the comments published in The Age, especially about public housing tenants, were unfortunate, even rather sad.

But they were private discussions. Who amongst us hasn't said stupid things in private? I'd love a CD of mine, it'd be a chart-topper.

Maybe Ted Baillieu while mid-hissy fit in 104 Exhibition Street has also said some things he could regret in private discussions and temper tantrums. Imagine if someone had taped such an exchange, like one of his screaming matches with former party president Russell Hannan before the chap quit, exhausted by Red Ted's paranoia, manic determination to get his own way and control freak micro-managing.

Baillieu's leaking of the emails is unquestionably a more problematic offence than the authoring of a blog whose observations seemed overwhelmingly accurate, if at times harsh because of the cloak of anonymity. It takes a rare blog indeed to call Fran Bailey a "fat b*tch" without the benefit of being anonymous. Her weight, gender and prickliness are not really an issue compared the unpleasant woman's war-crimes against staff from what the OC hears.

In addition to the outrage about the poor form Ted has already demonstrated, there is much talk about where the internal party investigation will head next.

MP's CAUGHT PLAYING FACTIONAL POLITICS BY EMAIL // WILL IT BE COVERED UP? OR RELEASED TO PAUL AUSTIN?

A number of sources tell the OC that this investigation could easily show that party officials - using Liberal party email and members of parliament using their parliamentary email - actively working on factional business, including devising and distributing factional tickets and other supposedly high crimes and misdemeanours.

We've already provided a hit-list of Baillieu targets but it's clear that Tony Barry, Julian Sheezel, Helen Kroger, Scott Ryan and Jason Aldworth have all plenty to be worried about. They might not be expelled, if Kemp is to be taken at his word.

But they could have their prestige among the party membership considerably reduced if their private correspondence (or enough of it that had been sent to the work email of John Osborn or Simon Morgan) discussing factional matters is released by Ted Baillieu or his staff including Michael Kapel, party animal Paul Price and enforcer Simon Troeth.

So all the Kroger faction folks are naturally very worried about being witch-hunted. But perhaps not now half as worried as Red Ted Baillieu has reason to be.

He's a goner. We already saw Seven's Iron Chef Brendan Donohue ask the traditional question of leadership challengers last night, where Terry Mulder expressed his full support for Ted Baillieu, as you do. It's just the beginning. This snow flake landed high in the mountains that will eventually turn into an avalanche on Red Ted's head.

Like Kemp, he should figuratively be very alarmed about seeing any red dots of the kind that come from long-distance laser rifle sights. Baillieu has already endured one head-shot from a grassy knoll on the Neil Mitchell show. If he persists with the madness of expelling people for their privately held views, he'd better get used to it.

The Kroger IDF is a well-trained and militant force that hasn't lost a battle for quite some time, Liberal insiders say. And like the IDF that defends an oasis of freedom surrounded by the deserts of dictatorship and evil, the Kroger forces are now fighting for their very survival. Betting against them seems remarkably risky.

Game on.

UPDATE:

■ John Ferguson at the Hun has gone from curiously supporting the jihad to now reporting on the growing fury of "senior Liberal figures" about Baillieu's handling of this crisis. Note the quote referring to jihads. I think the OC's colourful language might be infiltrating the minds of our readers.

■ Paul Austin at The Age as above has gone from publishing private emails of people on Red Ted's Enemies List to now reporting concerns this "was a gross breach of privacy". That's one way of putting it. Indeed reading his yarn now seems "ominously" similar to the OC's rants of the past few days. Baillieu leadership under fire, indeed. Perhaps Paul Austin's leadership of The Age's state political writers ought be under fire too.

■ Meanwhile the more sensible Rick Wallace at The Australian who broke news yesterday of the presumably unprecedented situation of 104 Exhibition Street conducting an investigation into their own Leader's office for leaking today reports that the clowns in Red Ted's circus are very quickly back-pedalling on their unicycles away from the mad hysteria of expelling anyone opposed to him:

Mr Baillieu yesterday dropped all talk of purges, traitors and cells - which had prompted MPs to liken him to Stalin - saying in more muted terms that "we are going to get to the bottom of this and stamp it out". Quizzed about the investigation into suggestions his office leaked the emails, he said he would not provide "a running commentary on this".

A senior Liberal source predicted the bungled handling of the crisis would soon see Mr Baillieu toppled as leader.

"All hell is going to break loose over the next few weeks. This bloke is isolated - he's publicly blown up the party for the sake of a website that no one read. The business community is in meltdown and the donations will dry up," the source said.

A website that had an audience of one: Red Ted. If he goes down, as appears inevitable now, it will have achieved an objective many patriots have been fondly dreaming of for a long time.

In now Dead Ted's misconduct since Sunday we see:

1) why the Ted Baillieu Must Go website was justified and was mostly correct,

2) just how astonishingly successful it turned out to be in destabilising him mainly because of his own over-reaction and

3) that this chap who is so keen to appear born-to-rule just never had it in him.

Click here to Read More on this post...